Dersin Detayları Dersin Dili İngilizce Dersin Düzeyi Yüksek Lisans Bölümü / Programı Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Tezli Yüksek Lisans Programı (İngilizce) Öğrenim Türü Örgün Öğretim Dersin Türü Seçmeli Dersin Öğretim Şekli Yüz Yüze Dersin Amacı 1. Develop analytical thinking and deepen their knowledge of theoretical and practical aspects of strategic studies. 2. Discuss types and instruments of warfare. 3. Link the study of strategy with the realities of modern politics and its use by states in pursuit of their interests. Dersin İçeriği This course discusses numerous theoretical and practical issues in strategic studies as a subfield of international relations. The course examines theories. concepts and issues, which explain the evolution, nature and state’s intention to prepare and use military power to serve its political needs and interests. The topics include: The Meaning and Core Dimensions of Strategy, Strategy as a Science, Strategy and Security Environment. Grand Strategy and Emergent Strategy, Historical Setting of Strategic Studies, Instruments of Strategy such as War and Types of Regular Warfare (Land Warfare, Naval Warfare. Air Warfare), Asymmetric and Irregular Wars (Guerrilla War, Civil War and Strategic Terrorism), Strategic Issues (Arms Control and Disarmament, Nuclear Deterrence, Balance of Terror and Proliferation, Insurgency and Counterinsurgency Warfare), Drone Strikes, the Uses of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks and Grand Strategy and New Directions for Strategy and Strategic Studies. Students are expected to engage the readings fully and actively participate in class discussions and debates. Dersin Yöntem ve Teknikleri Ön Koşulları Yok Dersin Koordinatörü Yok Dersi Verenler Yok Dersin Yardımcıları Yok Dersin Staj Durumu Var Ders Kaynakları Kaynaklar Ionut C. Popescu (2018) Grand Strategy vs. Emergent Strategy in the conduct of foreign policy, Journal of Strategic Studies, 41:3, pp. 438-460. (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1288109). Shiping Tang (2004) A Systemic Theory of the Security Environment, Journal of Strategic Studies, 27:1, 1-34, (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0140239042000232756). Henrik Breitenbauch & André Ken Jakobsson (2018) Defence planning as strategic fact: introduction, Defence Studies, 18:3, 253-261. (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1497443) Nina Silove (2017), “Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of Grand Strategy,” Security Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1., pp. 27-57. William C. Martel (2015), “Foundations of Grand Strategy,” in W. C. Martel, Grand Strategy in Theory and Practice: The Need for an Effective American Foreign Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23-56. Hew Strachan (2005), “The Lost Meaning of Strategy,” Survival, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 33-54. Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds) (2008) Strategic Studies: A Reader, (USA & Canada: Routledge), pp. 1-50. McArdle Kelleher (2016) “The Postwar Evolution of the Field of Strategic Studies: Robert O’Neill” in Context Catherine Daniel Marston and Tamara Leahy (eds.) War, Strategy and History: Essays in Honour of Professor Robert O’Neill, (Australia: The Australian National University Press). Thomas G. Mahnken (2011) “The Evolution of Strategy … But What About Policy?”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 34:4, (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.594673). Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds) (2008) Strategic Studies: A Reader, (USA & Canada: Routledge), pp. 50-180. Andreas Herberg-Rothe (2014) “Clausewitz’s Concept of Strategy – Balancing Purpose, Aims and Means”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 37:6-7, 903-925, (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.853175) George Dimitriu (2018), “Clausewitz and the politics of war: A contemporary theory”, Journal of Strategic Studies, (link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1529567). Jonathan Shimshoni, (1990-1991) “Technology, Military Advantage, and World War I: A Case for Military Entrepreneurship”, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 3, , pp. 187-215. Karl Lautenschelager, (1983) “Technology and the Evolution of Naval Warfare”, International Security, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 3-51. Robert A. Pape, (2004) “The True Worth of Air Power”, Foreign Affairs Vol. 83, No. 2., pp. 116-130. Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds) (2008) Strategic Studies: A Reader, (USA & Canada: Routledge), pp. 241-360. Michael J. Mazzar (2008), “The Folly of ‘Asymmetric War’”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.31, No. 3, pp. 33–53. Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds) (2008) Strategic Studies: A Reader, (USA & Canada: Routledge), pp. 181-240. Gray, Colin S., (1999), “To Confuse Ourselves: Nuclear Fallacies” in The Second Nuclear Age, Boulder, Lynne Rienner. Jervis, Robert (1993), “Arms Control, Stability, and Causes of War”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 108, No. 2., pp. 239-253 Jacqueline L. Hazelton 1 (2017) “Drone Strikes and Grand Strategy: Toward a Political Understanding of the Uses of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Attacks in US Security Policy”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 40:1-2, 68-91, (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1196589). Amy Zegart (2020) “Cheap fights, credible threats: The future of armed drones and coercion”, Journal of Strategic Studies, 43:1, 6-46, (To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1439747). Thomas G. Mahnken and Joseph A. Maiolo (eds) (2008) Strategic Studies: A Reader, (USA & Canada: Routledge), pp. 361-436. Chad M. Briggs (2010) “Environmental Change, Strategic Foresight, and Impacts on Military Power”, Parameters, Vol. 40, Autumn, pp. 76-90. Colin S. Gray (1992), “New Dire 30 30 40 Ders Yapısı Sosyal Bilimler %100

 





https://obs.ihu.edu.tr/oibs/bologna/progCourseDetails.aspx?curCourse=247667&lang=tr