Hafta | Konu | Ön Hazırlık | Dökümanlar |
1 |
Week 1
A General Introduction
Main parameters of Turkish political system: change and continuity, center-periphery relations, securitization, historical legacy.
|
|
*Feroz Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey, (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 1-148.
*Şerif Mardin, “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?,” Daedalus, no. 102 (1973), pp. 169–90.
|
2 |
Week 2-3
A Brief History from 1980 to the 2000s
Restoration of the political system, 12 September 1980 military intervention, the 1982 Constitution and the new political structure, Özal period, neo-liberal economic policies, 1990s: the coalitions and economic crises; 2002 elections and the AK Party period.
|
|
*Erich von Zurcher, “The Third Republic: Turkey since 1980,” in Turkey: A Modern History (London, New York: I.B. Tauris, 2003, 3rd edition), pp. 278-337.
*Feroz Ahmad, The Quest for Identity (Oxford: Oneworld, 2003), pp. 149-184.
**Kerem Öktem, Angry Nation: Turkey Since 1989 (London: Zed Books, 2011), pp. 56-189.
**Ergun Özbudun, Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation (Boulder, London: Lynne Reinner, 2000), pp. 49-71.
**Ergun Özbudun, “The Basic Characteristics of the 1982 Constitution,” in the Constitutional System of Turkey: 1876 to the Present (New York: Palgrave, 2011), pp. 19-37.
|
3 |
Week 2-3
A Brief History from 1980 to the 2000s
Restoration of the political system, 12 September 1980 military intervention, the 1982 Constitution and the new political structure, Özal period, neo-liberal economic policies, 1990s: the coalitions and economic crises; 2002 elections and the AK Party period.
|
|
*Erich von Zurcher, “The Third Republic: Turkey since 1980,” in Turkey: A Modern History (London, New York: I.B. Tauris, 2003, 3rd edition), pp. 278-337.
*Feroz Ahmad, The Quest for Identity (Oxford: Oneworld, 2003), pp. 149-184.
**Kerem Öktem, Angry Nation: Turkey Since 1989 (London: Zed Books, 2011), pp. 56-189.
**Ergun Özbudun, Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation (Boulder, London: Lynne Reinner, 2000), pp. 49-71.
**Ergun Özbudun, “The Basic Characteristics of the 1982 Constitution,” in the Constitutional System of Turkey: 1876 to the Present (New York: Palgrave, 2011), pp. 19-37.
|
4 |
Week 4-5
Political Parties: The RPP, NAP and AK Party
|
|
*Derya Kömürcü and Gökhan Demir, “Nationalist Action Party and the Politics of Dissent,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol.5, no.8, (2014), pp. 552-557.
*Hakan Mehmet Kiris¸, “The CHP: From the Single Party to the Permanent Main Opposition Party,” Turkish Studies, vol. 13, no. 3 (2012), pp. 397-413.
*Burhanettin Duran, “The Justice and Development Party’s ‘New Politics’: Steering Toward Conservative Democracy, a Revised Islamic Agenda or Management of New Crises?,” in Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development Party, Ümit Cizre (eds), (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 80–106.
*Burhanettin Duran, “The Codes of the AK Party’s Ideological Transformation”, in AK Party Years in Turkey Domestic and Foreign Policy, Burhanettin Duran, Kılıç Buğra Kanat (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), pp. 7-42.
|
5 |
Week 4-5
Political Parties: The RPP, NAP and AK Party
|
|
*Derya Kömürcü and Gökhan Demir, “Nationalist Action Party and the Politics of Dissent,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol.5, no.8, (2014), pp. 552-557.
*Hakan Mehmet Kiris¸, “The CHP: From the Single Party to the Permanent Main Opposition Party,” Turkish Studies, vol. 13, no. 3 (2012), pp. 397-413.
*Burhanettin Duran, “The Justice and Development Party’s ‘New Politics’: Steering Toward Conservative Democracy, a Revised Islamic Agenda or Management of New Crises?,” in Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development Party, Ümit Cizre (eds), (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 80–106.
*Burhanettin Duran, “The Codes of the AK Party’s Ideological Transformation”, in AK Party Years in Turkey Domestic and Foreign Policy, Burhanettin Duran, Kılıç Buğra Kanat (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), pp. 7-42.
|
6 |
Week 6-7
Political Leaders
Turgut Özal, Necmettin Erbakan, Bülent Ecevit, Süleyman Demirel, R. Tayyip Erdoğan
|
|
*Yeşim Arat, “Süleyman Demirel: National Will and Beyond,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 87-106.
*Feride Acar, “Turgut Özal: Pious Agent of Liberal Transformation,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 163-180.
*Atilla Yayla, “Turkey's Leaders - Erbakan's Goals,” Middle East Quarterly, (1997), pp. 19-25.
*Frank Tachau, “Bülent Ecevit: From Idealist to Pragmatist,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 107-126.
*Metin Heper and Şule Toktaş, “Islam, Modernity, and Democracy in Contemporary Turkey: The Case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan,” The Muslim World, vol. 93, no. 2 (April 2003),
pp. 157–185.
|
7 |
Week 6-7
Political Leaders
Turgut Özal, Necmettin Erbakan, Bülent Ecevit, Süleyman Demirel, R. Tayyip Erdoğan
|
|
*Yeşim Arat, “Süleyman Demirel: National Will and Beyond,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 87-106.
*Feride Acar, “Turgut Özal: Pious Agent of Liberal Transformation,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 163-180.
*Atilla Yayla, “Turkey's Leaders - Erbakan's Goals,” Middle East Quarterly, (1997), pp. 19-25.
*Frank Tachau, “Bülent Ecevit: From Idealist to Pragmatist,” in Political Leaders and Democracy in Turkey, Metin Heper and Sabri Sayari (eds), (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2002), pp. 107-126.
*Metin Heper and Şule Toktaş, “Islam, Modernity, and Democracy in Contemporary Turkey: The Case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan,” The Muslim World, vol. 93, no. 2 (April 2003),
pp. 157–185.
|
8 |
Week 8
Civil-Military Relations and Crisis of Kemalism
The February 28 process, the 27 April e-memorandum and prospects.
|
|
*Ümit Cizre & Menderes Çınar, “Turkey 2003: Kemalism, Islamism and Politics in the Light of the February 28 Process,” South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 102, no. 2/3 (2003), pp. 309-332.
*Reşat Kasaba, “Kemalist Certainities and Modern Ambiguities,” in Rethinking Modernity and National Identity, Sibel Bozdoğan and Reşat Kasaba (eds), (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1997), 15-36.
**Ümit Cizre, “The Turkish Military,” in Turkey in the Modern World (The Cambridge History of Turkey, vol. 4), Reşat Kasaba (eds), (Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, 2008).
**Mehmet Ali Birand, The Generals’ Coup in Turkey: An Inside Story of 12 September 1980 (London: Brassey’s Defence Publishers, 1987).
**Esra Özyürek, Nostalgia for the Modern: State Secularism and Everyday Politics in Turkey (Durham: Duke University Press, 2006).
**Ümit Cizre, “Anatomy of the Military’s Political Autonomy,” Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 2 (1997), pp. 151–66.?
|
9 |
Week 9
EU and Democratization
|
|
*Ali Resul Usul, Democracy in Turkey: The Impact of EU Political Conditionality (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 143-169.
*Gözde Yılmaz, “From Europeanization to De-Europeanization: The Europeanization
Process of Turkey in 1999–2014,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 24, no.1 (2016), pp. 86-100.
**William Hale, “Human Rights and Turkey’s EU Accession Process: Internal and
External Dynamics, 2005-2010,” South European Society and Politics, vol. 16, no. 2 (2011), pp. 323-333.
**Nathalie Tocci, “Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?,” South European Society and Politics vol. 10, no. 1 (2005), pp. 71–81.
**Ioannis N. Grigoiadis, Trials of Europeanization: Turkish Political Culture and the European Union (New York: Palgrave, 2009).
**Ergun Özbudun and Ömer F. Gençkaya, Democratization and the Politics of Constitution-Making in Turkey (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2009).
|
10 |
Week 10
Different Aspects of Islamism in Turkey
|
|
*Şerif Mardin, “Turkish Islamic Exceptionalism Yesterday and Today: Continuity, Rupture and Reconstruction in Operational Codes,” Turkish Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, (2005), pp. 145–65.
*Filiz Başkan, “The Rising Islamic Business Elite and Democratization in Turkey,” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, vol. 12, no. 4 (2010), pp. 399-416.
*Burhanettin Duran, “The Experience of Turkish Islamism: Between Transformation and Impoverishment,” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, vol. 12, no. 1 (March 2010), pp. 5-22.
*Menderes Çınar and Burhanettin Duran, “The ‘Specific’ Evolution of Contemporary Political Islam in Turkey and Its ‘Difference’” in Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of The Justice and Development Party Ümit Cizre (eds), (London: Routledge, 2008).
|
11 |
Week 11
The Kurdish Question and Alevi Identity
Politicization of Kurdish and Alevi Identity in Turkey, the PKK and the Resolution Process
|
|
*Talha Köse, “Rise and Fall of the AK Party’s Kurdish Peace Initiatives,” Insight Turkey, vol. 19, no. 2, (2017), pp. 89-115.
*M. Hakan Yavuz and Nihat Ali Özcan, “Turkish Democracy and the Kurdish Question,” Middle East Policy, vol. 22, no. 4, (2015), pp. 73–87
*Talha Köse, “Between Nationalism, Modernism and Secularism: The Ambivalent Place of ‘Alevi Identities,” Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 49, no. 4 (2013), pp. 590-607.
**Hüseyin Alptekin and Talha Köse, “The AK Party’s Kurdish Policy”, in AK Party Years in Turkey Domestic and Foreign Policy, Burhanettin Duran, Kılıç Buğra Kanat (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), pp. 85-114.
**Joost Jongerden and Ahmed Hamdi Akkaya, “Born from the Left: the making of the PKK,” in Nationalisms and Politics in Turkey: Political Islam, Kemalism and the Kurdish Issue, Marlies Casier and Joost Jongerden (eds), (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 123-142
|
12 |
Week 12
Transformation and Crisis in Turkish Foreign Policy
AK Party period: multidimensional foreign policy, after the Arap Spring; Turkey in a troubled region.
|
|
*Malik Müftü, “Turkey’s Choice,” Insight Turkey, vol.19, no.1, (2017), pp. 71-87.
*Murat Yeşiltaş, “The New Era in Turkish Foreign Policy: Critiques and Challenges,” Insight Turkey, vol.16, no.3, (2014), pp.25-36.
*Kılıç Buğra Kanat, “Theorizing the Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy,” Insight Turkey, vol.16, no.1, (2014), pp. 65-84.
**Burhanettin Duran, “JDP and Foreign Policy As An Agent of Transformation,” in Emergence of a New Turkey: Islam, Democracy and the AK Party, M. Hakan Yavuz (eds), (Utah: The University of Utah Press, 2006).
**Kılıç Buğra Kanat, “Turkish-American Relations During the AK Party Governments”, in AK Party Years in Turkey Domestic and Foreign Policy, Burhanettin Duran, Kılıç Buğra Kanat (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), pp. 263-286.
|
13 |
Week 13
Turbulent Years (2013-2017): The Gezi Park protests, the December 17-25 Judicial Coup Attempt and the July 15 Coup Attempt.
|
|
*Hatem Ete, “The Political Reverberations of the Gezi Protests,” Insight Turkey, vol. 15, no. 3 (2013), 15-25.
*Burhanettin Duran and Fahrettin Altun, The Triumph of Turkish Democracy: The July 15 Coup Attempt and Its Aftermath (İstanbul: SETA, 2016), pp. 26-28, 53-57, 63-74, 132-135, 154-163.
*Nebi Miş, “Measuring Social Perception of the July 15 Coup Attempt,” in July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey: Context, Causes, and Consequences, Muhittin Ataman (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2017), pp. 103-147.
*Şener Aktürk, “Turkey’s Civil Rights Movement and The Reactionary Coup: Segregation, Emancipation, and the Western Reaction,” in July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey: Context, Causes, and Consequences, Muhittin Ataman (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2017), pp. 67-103.
**Nebi Miş, “The July 15 Coup Attempt’s Effects on Turkish Politics”, in AK Party Years in Turkey Domestic and Foreign Policy, Burhanettin Duran, Kılıç Buğra Kanat (eds), (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), pp. 149-184.
|
14 |
Week 14
The April 16 Referendum and transition to the Presidential System
|
|
*Nebi Miş and Burhanettin Duran, Turkey’s Presidential System: Model and Practices (SETA: İstanbul, 2018), pp. 14-141.
*Kılıç Buğra Kanat, Jackson Hannon and Meggan Baker, Turkey’s Elections 2018, SETA Report, (SETA: İstanbul, 2018).
**Fahrettin Altun, “Laying the Cornerstone for a New Turkey: The June 24 Elections”, Insight Turkey, vol. 20, no. 3, (Summer 2018), pp. 89-102.
**Serdar Gülener, “The Constitutional Amendment Draft: The End of Debates on Change in the Turkish Political System?,” Insight Turkey, vol. 18, no. 4 (2016), pp. 109-125.
** S. Erdem Aytaç, Ali Çarkoğlu and Kerem Yıldırım, “Taking Sides: Determinants of Support for a Presidential System in Turkey”, South European Society and Politics, vol. 22., no. 1 (2017), pp.1-20.
|