Course Information
SemesterCourse Unit CodeCourse Unit TitleT+P+LCreditNumber of ECTS Credits
1POLS 503Political Theory3+0+038

Course Details
Language of Instruction English
Level of Course Unit Master's Degree
Department / Program MA Program in Political Science and International Relations (Thesis) (English)
Type of Program Formal Education
Type of Course Unit Compulsory
Course Delivery Method Face To Face
Objectives of the Course This seminar aims to introduce modern political theories and debates to graduate students.
Course Content It i) attempts to provide a general framework of political theory as an academic field, ii) gives an account of modern political theories such as liberalism, libertarianism, communitarianism, republicanism, Marxism, critical theory, post-Marxism, and post-structuralism, iii) discusses the key concepts such as modernity, liberty, equality, justice, legitimacy, community, power, identity, discourse, democracy, populism, hegemony, and nihilism that determine current political life.
Course Methods and Techniques
Prerequisites and co-requisities None
Course Coordinator None
Name of Lecturers Asist Prof.Dr. Ali Aslan
Assistants None
Work Placement(s) No

Recommended or Required Reading
Resources

Course Category
Social Sciences %100

Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods
Activities are given in detail in the section of "Assessment Methods and Criteria" and "Workload Calculation"

Assessment Methods and Criteria
In-Term Studies Quantity Percentage
Assignment 2 % 50
Attendance 1 % 20
Final examination 1 % 30
Total
4
% 100

 
ECTS Allocated Based on Student Workload
Activities Quantity Duration Total Work Load
Course Duration 14 3 42
Assignments 2 10 20
Final examination 1 1 1
Total Work Load   Number of ECTS Credits 2 63

Course Learning Outcomes: Upon the successful completion of this course, students will be able to:
NoLearning Outcomes
1 Elaborate the basic assumptions of competing traditions of modern political theory
2 Formulate falsifiable research questions and sound research designs about politics by applying various traditions of modern political theory
3 Criticize the existing traditions of modern political theory as to challenge and contribute to the field
4 Compare and contrast competing traditions of modern political theory in an analytical way


Weekly Detailed Course Contents
WeekTopicsStudy MaterialsMaterials
1 Introduction and overview of the course
2 Liberalism: Liberty, Equality and Justice John Rawls, “Fundamental Ideas” in John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001, pp. 1-38. Isaiah Berlin, “Two Concepts of Liberty” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 15-36. Ronald Dworkin, “Liberalism” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 60-80. Robert Nozick, “Moral Constraints and Distributive Justice” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 100-122. Friedrich A. Hayek, “Equality, Value, and Merit” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 80-99.
3 The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism: Community and Tradition Michael Sandel, “Introduction” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 1-11. Michael Walzer, “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism,” Political Theory, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1990, pp. 6-23. Michael J. Sandel, “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self,” Political Theory, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1984, pp. 81-96. Alasdair MacIntyre, “The Virtues, the Unity of a Human Life and the Concept of Tradition” in Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 125-149. Charles Taylor, “Hegel: History and Politics” in Michael Sandel, Liberalism and Its Critics, New York: NYU Press, 1984, pp. 177-200.
4 The Republican Critique of Liberalism: Freedom as Non-Domination and Civic Virtue Cecile Laborde and John Maynor, “The Republican Contribution to Contemporary Political Theory” in Cecile Laborde and John Maynor, Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, pp. 1-28. Quentin Skinner, “Liberty as the Absence of Arbitrary Power” in Cecile Laborde and John Maynor, Republicanism and Political Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, pp. 83-101. Philip Petit, “Liberalism and Republicanism,” Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 28, 1993, pp. 162-189.
5 The Marxist Critique of Liberalism: The Theory of Alienation and Class Conflict The Marxist Critique of Liberalism: The Theory of Alienation and Class Conflict
6 Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony Antonio Gramsci, “The Intellectuals (pp. 3-23),” “The Concept of Passive Revolution (pp. 106-114),” “The History of Europe Seen as ‘Passive Revolution’ (pp. 118-120),” “Brief Notes on Machiavelli’s Politics (pp. 125-133),” “Machiavelli and Marx (pp. 133-136),” “Politics as an Autonomous Science (pp. 136-143),” “Elements of Politics (pp. 144-147),” “The Political Party (pp. 147-157),” “State and Civil Society: Introduction (pp. 206-210),” “Political Parties in Periods of Organic Crisis (pp. 210-219),” “Caesarism (pp. 219-223),” “Political Struggle and Military War (pp. 229-238,” “The Transition from the War of Manoeuver to the War of Position (pp. 238-239),” “The Conception of Law (pp. 246-247)” and “The State (pp. 257-264)” in Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, New York: International Publishers, 1992.
7 Midterm exam
8 Weber and the Dark Side of Modernity Max Weber, “The Spirit of Capitalism” in Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New York: Routledge, 2001, pp. 13-38. Max Weber, “The Institutionalization of Authority (pp. 56-77),” “The Concept of Legitimate Order (pp. 124-126),” “The Types of Legitimate Order (pp. 126-130)” and “The Bases of Legitimacy of an Order (pp. 130-132)” in Max Weber, Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press, 1964. Max Weber, “Politics as a Vocation” in H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1946, pp. 77-128.
9 Nihilism and Politics Friedrich Nietzsche, “Preface (pp. 3-4),” “On the prejudices of philosophers (pp. 5-24),” “The free spirit (pp. 25-42)” “On the natural history of morals (pp. 75-92)” and “What is noble? (pp. 151-177)” in Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Friedrich Nietzsche, “Nietzsche’s Preface (pp. 15-23” and “‘Good and evil,’ ‘Good and bad’ (pp. 24-56)” in Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, New York: Vintage Books, 1989. Martin Heidegger, “The Question Concerning Technology” in Martin Heidegger, Basic Writings, San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1993, pp. 307-341. Jürgen Habermas, “The Entry into Postmodernity: Nietzsche as a Turning Point” in Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987, pp. 83-105.
10 Critical Theory: Emancipation and Beyond Jürgen Habermas, “An Alternative Way Out of the Philosophy of the Subject: Communicative versus Subject-Centered Reason” in Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987, pp. 294-326. Jürgen Habermas, “Morality, Society and Ethics: An Interview with Torben Hviid Nielsen” in Jürgen Habermas, Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1993, pp.147-176. Axel Honneth, “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: On the Location of Critical Theory Today” in Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity, 2007, pp. 63-79. Axel Honneth, “From Struggles for Recognition to a Plural Concept of Justice: An Interview with Axel Honneth,” Acta Sociologica, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2004, pp. 383-391.
11 Post-Foundationalism: Groundless Existence Oliver Marchart, “Introduction: On the Absent Ground of the Social (pp. 1-10),” “The Contours of ‘Left Heideggerianism’: Post-foundationalism and Necessary Contingency (pp. 11-34)” and “Politics and the Political: Genealogy of a Conceptual Difference (pp. 35-60)” in Oliver Marchart, Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007. Carl Schmitt, “The Concept of the Political” in Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 19-79.
12 Poststructuralism: Power and Subject Michel Foucault, “What is Enlightenment? (pp. 32-50),” “Truth and Power (pp. 51-75)” and “Politics and Ethics: An Interview (pp. 373-380)” in Paul Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books, 1984. Michel Foucault, “The Subject and Power,” Critical Inquiry, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1982, pp. 777-795. Jürgen Habermas, “Some Questions Concerning the Theory of Politics: Foucault Again” in Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987, pp. 266-293.
13 Democracy: Competing Approaches Jürgen Habermas, “Three Normative Models of Democracy” in Jürgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Maldon, MA: Polity Press, 1998, pp. 239-252. Carl Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988, pp. 22-50. Claude Lefort, “The Question of Democracy,” Democracy and Political Theory, Maldon, MA: Polity Press, 1988, pp. 9-20. Chantal Mouffe, “For an Agonistic Model of Democracy” in Noel E. Sullivan, (ed.), Political Theory in Transition, London and New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 113-130. Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London and New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 269-283.
14 Populism: A Contested Concept? Jan-Werner Müller, What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016. Chantal Mouffe, For a Left Populism, London and New York: Verso, 2018. Cas Mudde and Cristobal R. Kaltwasser, “What is Populism?” in Populism: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 1-20. Ernesto Laclau, “Populism: What’s in a Name?” David Howarth, (ed.), Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique, London and New York: Routledge, 2015, pp. 152-164.


Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
C1
C2
C3
C4

Contribution: 1: Very Slight 2:Slight 3:Moderate 4:Significant 5:Very Significant


https://obs.ihu.edu.tr/oibs/bologna/progCourseDetails.aspx?curCourse=247613&lang=en