Dersin Ayrıntıları
YarıyılKoduAdıT+U+LKrediAKTS
1POLS 581Regional Orders3+0+038

Dersin Detayları
Dersin Dili Türkçe
Dersin Düzeyi Yüksek Lisans
Bölümü / Programı Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Tezli Yüksek Lisans Programı (İngilizce)
Öğrenim Türü Örgün Öğretim
Dersin Türü Seçmeli
Dersin Öğretim Şekli Yüz Yüze
Dersin Amacı The study of regionalism has developed in a series of waves since the 1970s. In the first wave, regionalism
became an important subject as the bipolar world order waned as a result of détente in the Cold War context. The
regional level became salient whereas the international systemic level withdraws to the background. However, it
lost its importance and dynamism in the 1980s, the international level once again came to dominance. In the
second wave, regionalism developed as a reaction against globalization starting in the mid-1990s. Region-wide
economic integration processes in numbers of world regions gained pace alongside the economic integration of
the globe. The third wave is now underway for about a decade and lately gained momentum with the decline of
the US-led unipolar liberal international order. This course, first of all, attempts to understand the rise and decline
of regionalism with a historical perspective. Secondly, it seeks to shed light on the academic debates over the
issues such as regional orders and regional powers and theories and concepts hinges on these subjects.
Dersin İçeriği And lastly,
it aims to analyze regional order building attempts in various world regions such as Europe, Asia, Eurasia, Latin
America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and North Africa and the Middle East.
Dersin Yöntem ve Teknikleri
Ön Koşulları Yok
Dersin Koordinatörü Yok
Dersi Verenler Doç.Dr. Ali Aslan
Dersin Yardımcıları Yok
Dersin Staj Durumu Yok

Ders Kaynakları
Kaynaklar

Ders Yapısı
Sosyal Bilimler %100

Planlanan Öğrenme Aktiviteleri ve Metodları
Etkinlikler ayrıntılı olarak "Değerlendirme" ve "İş Yükü Hesaplaması" bölümlerinde verilmiştir.

Değerlendirme Ölçütleri
Yarıyıl Çalışmaları Sayısı Katkı
Ödev 1 % 50
Devam 1 % 20
Yarıyıl Sonu Sınavı 1 % 30
Toplam :
3
% 100

 
AKTS Hesaplama İçeriği
Etkinlik Sayısı Süre Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)
Ders Süresi 14 180 2520
Ödevler 1 50 50
Sunum/Seminer Hazırlama 1 10 10
Yarıyıl Sonu Sınavı 1 2 2
Toplam İş Yükü   AKTS Kredisi : 86 2582

Dersin Öğrenme Çıktıları: Bu dersin başarılı bir şekilde tamamlanmasıyla öğrenciler şunları yapabileceklerdir:
Sıra NoAçıklama
1 To evaluate the basic assumptions of competing theories of the study of regional orders.
2 To compare and contrast the competing theories of regional orders.
3 To formulate falsifiable research questions about regional orders by applying various theories of regional orders.
4 To create and apply research agendas on regional orders by using the theories of regional orders.
5 To criticize the existing theories of regional orders as to challenge and contribute to the field.
6 To analyze the development of the study of regional orders in an analytical way.


Ders Konuları
HaftaKonuÖn HazırlıkDökümanlar
1 1. Introduction T. V. Paul, “Regional Transformation in International Relations” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 3-21. Barry Buzan, “How Regions Were Made, and the Legacies for World Politics: An English School Reconnaissance” in T. V. Paul (ed.), International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 22-48.
2 2. The Study of Regions Rick Fawn, “‘Regions’ and Their Study: Wherefrom, What for and Whereto?” Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, 2009, pp. 5-34. Andrew Hurrell, “One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society.” International Affairs 83, no. 1 (2007): 127–146. Amitav Acharya, “The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics.” World Politics 59, no. 4 (2007): 629–652.
3 3. Realism and the Study of Regions Dale C. Copeland, “Realism and Neorealism in the Study of Regional Conflict” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 49-73. Jeffrey Taliaferro, “Neoclassical Realism and the Study of Regional Order” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 74-106.
4 4. Liberalism and the Study of Regions John M. Owen, IV, “Economic Interdependence and Regional Peace” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 107-132. Stephanie C. Hofmann and Frederic Merand, “Regional Organizations a la Carte: The Effects of Institutional Elasticity” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 133-157. John R. Oneal, “Transforming Regional Security Through Liberal Reforms” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 158-182.
5 Constructivism and the Study of Regions Amitav Acharya, “Ideas, Norms and Regional Orders” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 183-209. Vincent Pouliot, “Regional Security Practices and Russian-Atlantic Relations” in T. V. Paul, International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 210-232.
6 The Regional Power Sandra Destradi, “Regional Powers and Their Strategies: Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership.” Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2010, pp. 903–930. Detlef Nolte, “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2010, pp. 881-901. Miriam Prys, “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood,” International Studies Review, Vol. 12, pp. 479-504. Daniel Flemes, “Conceptualizing Regional Power in International Relations: Lessons from the South African Case.” In GIGA Working Paper. Hamburg: GIGA, 2007.
7 The Follower States David A. Lake, “Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2009, pp. 35–58. Charles A. Kupchan, “The Normative Foundations of Hegemony and the Coming Challenge to Pax Americana,” Security Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2014, pp. 219-257. Ji Young-Lee, “Hegemonic Authority and Domestic Legitimation: Japan and Korea under Chinese Hegemonic Order in Early Modern East Asia,” Security Studies, Vol. 25, pp. 320-352. Ali Balcı, “Algeria in Declining Ottoman Hierarchy: Why Algiers Remained Loyal to the Falling Patron,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 2020, pp. 1-19.
8 The External Powers Ian S. Lustick, “The Absence of Middle Eastern Great Powers: Political “Backwardness” in Historical Perspective,” International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, 1997, pp. 653-683. Sebastian Rosato, “Europe’s Troubles: Power Politics and the State of the European Project,” International Security, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 45-86.
9 Europe T. Diez, I. Manners and R. G. Whitman, “The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union,” Journal of European Integration, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2011, pp. 117-138. Matthias Matthijs, “Europe after Brexit: A Less Perfect Union,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 96, No. 1, 2017, pp. 85-95. Anders Wivel and Ole Weaver, “The Power of Peaceful Change: The Crisis of the European Union and the Rebalancing of Europe’s Regional Order,” International Studies Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2018, pp. 317-325. John J. Mearsheimer, “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order,” International Security, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2019, pp. 7-50.
10 The Middle East Michael N. Barnett, “Sovereignty, Nationalism and Regional Order in the Arab States System,” International Organization, Vol. 49, No. 3, 1995, pp. 479-510. Ruth H. Santini, “A New Regional Cold War in the Middle East and North Africa: Regional Security Complex Theory Revisited,” The International Spectator, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2017, pp. 93-111. Henner Fürtig (ed.), Regional Powers in the Middle East, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
11 Central Asia Ariel G. Levazzi, “Central Eurasia: From the Historical Foundations to the Age of Strong Leaders” in Ariel G. Levazzi, Confrontational and Cooperative Regional Orders, London and New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 43-117. S. Neil Macfarlane, “Contested Regional Leadership: Russia and Eurasia” in H. Ebert and D. Flemes (eds.), Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 275-300.
12 Africa Daniel Flemes, “Regional Power South Africa: Cooperative Hegemony Constrained by Historical Legacy,” Journal of Contemporary African Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2009, pp. 135-157. Christof Hartmann, “Regionalism in Sub-Saharan Africa: Structural Constraints and Agency” in D. Nolte and B. Weiffen (eds.), Regionalism under Stress, New York and London: Routledge, 2020, pp. 209-222. Sören Scholvin, “Contestation in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Foreign Policies of Angola, Kenya and Nigeria vis-à-vis South Africa” in H. Ebert and D. Flemes (eds.), Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 137-162.
13 East Asia David A. Lake, “Domination, Authority, and the Forms of Chinese Power,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2017, pp. 357-382. Maria-Gabriela Manea, “Regionalism in Distress: Is ASEAN Coping with Global Crises and Power Shifts?” in D. Nolte and B. Weiffen (eds.), Regionalism under Stress, New York and London: Routledge, 2020, pp. 223-240. Miriam Prys, “India and South Asia in the World: On the Embeddedness of Regions in the International System and Its Consequences for Regional Powers,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2013, pp. 1-33. Ian Bowers and B. E. M. Gronning, “Protecting the Status Quo: Japan’s Response to the Rise of China” in R. S. Ross and O. Tunsjo (eds.), Strategic Adjustment and the Rise of China, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2017, pp. 137-168.
14 South America Ariel G. Levazzi, “South America: From Regional Transformation to the Decline of Brazilian-led “South Americanization”” in Ariel G. Levazzi, Confrontational and Cooperative Regional Orders, London and New York: Routledge, 2021, pp. 118-195. Sean Burges, “Thinking through Brazil’s Strategic Leadership Gap” in H. Ebert and D. Flemes (eds.), Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, pp. 63-84.


Dersin Program Çıktılarına Katkısı
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Tüm 4 3 4 3 4
Ö1 4 5 4 4 4
Ö2 4 5 3 4 5
Ö3 5 4 5 4 5
Ö4 5 3 5 5 5
Ö5 3 4 3 4 3
Ö6 4 4 4 5 4

Katkı Düzeyi: 1: Çok Düşük 2: Düşük 3: Orta 4: Yüksek 5: Çok Yüksek


https://obs.ihu.edu.tr/oibs/bologna/progCourseDetails.aspx?curCourse=247560&lang=tr