|
Language of Instruction
|
Turkish
|
|
Level of Course Unit
|
Master's Degree
|
|
Department / Program
|
LLM Program in Private Law (Thesis) (Turkish)
|
|
Type of Program
|
Formal Education
|
|
Type of Course Unit
|
Elective
|
|
Course Delivery Method
|
Face To Face
|
|
Objectives of the Course
|
This course aims to deepen participants' understanding of the intricate relationship between ethics and law. Over the first four weeks, we delve into the ethical dimensions of contemporary scientific advancements, particularly the connectome and artificial intelligence, questioning the human role as an ethical subject. The subsequent four weeks focus on dissecting Utilitarian, Kantian, Virtue Ethics, and Religious ethical theories, exploring their influence on individual choices and legal decisions. The remainder of the course hones analytical skills through the critical analysis of concrete court decisions, distinguishing instances where ethical considerations guide legal reasoning. Ultimately, the objective is to empower participants to contribute to fairer and more nuanced solutions by comprehending the complex interplay between ethics and law in decision-making processes.
|
|
Course Content
|
In this course, the structural relationship of ethics and law beyond superficial discussions will be discussed. In the first 4 weeks, the possibility of human being as an ethical subject in the face of today's scientific developments, especially connectome and artificial intelligence, will be put forward as a problematic. In the second 4 weeks, the most accepted Utilitarian, Kantian, Virtue Ethics (Aristotelian) and Religious ethical theories will be discussed in terms of their role in our choices and the way they guide our behaviour, and as an extension of this quality, the extent to which they are effective in legal decisions will be determined. In the remaining weeks, the participants will be expected to analyse concrete court decisions that show the guiding role of ethical thinking or, on the contrary, that contain argumentation away from ethical considerations. Thus, it will be tried to develop the ability to reach fairer solutions and decisions by understanding the various and complex forms of relationship between ethics and law.
|
|
Course Methods and Techniques
|
|
|
Prerequisites and co-requisities
|
None
|
|
Course Coordinator
|
None
|
|
Name of Lecturers
|
Prof.Dr. Ahmet Ulvi Türkbağ
|
|
Assistants
|
None
|
|
Work Placement(s)
|
No
|
Recommended or Required Reading
|
Resources
|
Sandel, M. J. (2013). Adalet: Yapılması Gereken Doğru Şey Nedir? [Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?]. Ankara: BingBang Yayınları. Aristoteles. (1999). Eudemos’a Etik, (Çev. Saffet Babür). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. Aktaş, S. (2011). Prosedürel Doğal Hukuk: Lon L. Fuller'in Hukuk Kavramı. İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayıncılık. Aristoteles. (1997). Nikamakhos’a Etik, (Çev. Saffet Babür). Ankara: Ayraç Yayınevi. Bentham, J. (2011). Yasamanın İlkeleri, (Çev. Barkın Asal). İstanbul: On İki Levha Yayıncılık. Nietzsche, F. (2001). İyinin ve Kötünün Ötesinde, (Çev. Ahmet İnam). İstanbul: Yorum Yayınevi. Nietzsche, F. (2011). Ahlakın Soykütüğü Üzerine, (Çev. Ahmet İnam). İstanbul: Say Yayınları. Fuller, L. L. (1948). The Case of the Speluncean Explorers. Harv. L. Rev., 62, 616. Kierkegaard, S. (1986). Fear and Trembling. (Çev. Alastair Hannay). Penguin Classics. Stewart, J. (2008). Kierkegaard and His German Contemporaries Tome III: Literature and Aesthetics, Ashgate Publishing Limited. Film: Scott, R. (1982). Blade Runner (Ölüm Takibi). Film: Refiğ, H. (1980). Yorgun Savaşçı. Film: Spielberg, S. (2001). Artificial Intelligence: AI (Yapay Zeka). Film: Brooker, C. (2011 - …). Black Mirror. Kant, I. (2013). Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi, (Çev. I. Kuçuradi). Ankara: Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları.
|
|
Course Notes
|
Classroom Rules / Expectations Attendance Students are expected to attend the lectures and at least 70 per cent of the in-class work unless they have an excuse. Class participation is important since the course is based on the presentation practices of the students beyond the classical lecture. Participation and contribution to class discussions are important for the success of the course. In cases of excuse, contact can be made via the specified e-mail address to provide information about the participation status. If students make suggestions on different presentation topics or presentation techniques, changes can be made to the course flow through in-class discussions. In some courses, students may be asked to work in groups or if students make suggestions in this direction, they will be evaluated.
Late / Make-up Policy For students who cannot attend the final exam due to an excuse, a make-up exam is held according to the provisions of Ibn Haldun University Graduate Regulation. Students who notify an excuse within twenty-four hours at the latest after the presentation date are given the opportunity to make up. If corrections are requested in the assignments, the assignment must be submitted with the corrections within one week at the latest.
Re-evaluation Students who think that there is a material error in the exam or letter grade can apply to the instructor of the course for an objection within three working days following the announcement of the results. The objection is finalised by the relevant instructor within three working days.
Mobile Phone and Computer Use It is left to the student's preference whether to use powerpoint for presentation assignments. During the course it is possible to use a computer, but mobile phone use is forbidden.
Course Recording Audio and video recordings cannot be made in the course without permission.
Academic Honesty, Collaboration and Plagiarism If plagiarism is detected in the assignments, the student is considered unsuccessful in the course.
Special Cases Students with disabilities such as visual impairment, hearing impairment or special needs should contact the lecturer at the beginning of the semester and inform him/her about their special needs.
|
|
Assignments
|
Derse ilişkin seçilecek bir araştırma konusuna ilişkin olarak hazırlanacak yazılı ödevde öğrencinin uygun bir hukuki araştırma konusu tespit ederek, çalışmaya ilişkin kapak, içindekiler, kısaltmalar, giriş, ana veya yan başlıkları ve sonuç bölümü içerecek biçimde hazırlanması, araştırmaya konu hukuki probleme ilişkin kaynakları kaynak araştırmalarına ilişkin yöntemleri kullanarak belirlemesi, sistematize etmesi ve atıf yöntemlerini kullanarak ve sınıfta özet bir sunum yaparak tartışmaya açması
|
|
Exams
|
Vize: İHU yüksek lisans sınav takviminde belirlenen sınav haftasında gerçekleştirilir. Sınav süresi bir saat olup, yazılı ve klasik sınav yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilir. Başarı notunun hesaplanmasında bu sınav % 20 etkilidir. Dönem sonu sınavı: İHU yüksek lisans sınav takviminde belirlenen sınav haftasında gerçekleştirilir. Sınav süresi bir saat olup, yazılı ve klasik sınav yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilir. Başarı notunun hesaplanmasında bu sınav % 40 etkilidir.
|
|